BROOKS AND HALF A STORY

Have to send out a brief word on David
Brooks, Times columnist, T.V.panelist
& alleged pundit, latest sweetheart of
the right wing philosophy. Many avoid
reading Davey since one is usually in a
mood to cancel their subscriptions
after merely scanning his pedantic
tripe. Will only comment on his latest
article headlined "a prequel of politics
yet to come" since it personifies his
duplicitous screeds.

It concerns the senatorial race between
DeWine (R) and Brown (D). Brooks
makes it out to be the most vital race in
this election. Such nonsense. But the
main fault with the analysis of the race
is his not mentioning the state of the
republican party which is in a moribund
condition. He never mentions Taft,
Blackwell, Schmitt and half dozen other
embarressments who have disgusted the
party beyond repair for this November
election,(The Dems could have run Mike
Tyson in Ohio this year and he would
have been a factor) Why would David
ignore that fact? Take here is that this
is vintage Brooks telling half the story
and slip sliding away from key facts
that are detrimental to the neo-con
agenda. This is an irreversable method
of operation for Davey Boy and his
Weakly Standard puppeteers.