RE: STAR PARKER'S MISSIVE ON DEMS
The Foley blitz has brought out odd connections and tales from the nations politicians and pundits. Hastert blames Soros, but provides zero evidence. Benny Hill Gingrich castigated the Dems for poping the scandal at a "despicable" point in time which is just more Benny Hill hyperbole ignoring the fact that the reporter, Brian Ross, who broke the story, admittted he got it from the Repubs.
Back to Ms. Parker writing the mother of all blame games about the Foley mess.
The Foley blitz has brought out odd connections and tales from the nations politicians and pundits. Hastert blames Soros, but provides zero evidence. Benny Hill Gingrich castigated the Dems for poping the scandal at a "despicable" point in time which is just more Benny Hill hyperbole ignoring the fact that the reporter, Brian Ross, who broke the story, admittted he got it from the Repubs.
Back to Ms. Parker writing the mother of all blame games about the Foley mess.
Her explanation of the scandal entailed sexual promiscuity before marriage, the entertainment industry, under-age sex in high school,
states that approve abortion, "palpitating" Nancy Pelosi, Bill Cinton, "supposed" Democratic party outrage that is "simply a stage show to provoke voters".
Mark Foley is peripherally mentioned once in paragraph 2 which is about "liberal Democrats" being responsible for this "state of affairs".
Putting aside Ms.Parker's puerile, irrelevant gibberish, her scatter-gunned brief has a fatal flaw that relegates it to the nearest fireplace.
She completely ignores the pages in this wicked disgrace. Are their concerns totally insignificant to Ms. Parker that they do not merit a sentence in her diversionary polemic? Didn't it cross her threshold that the youngters involved, and not involved,
Putting aside Ms.Parker's puerile, irrelevant gibberish, her scatter-gunned brief has a fatal flaw that relegates it to the nearest fireplace.
She completely ignores the pages in this wicked disgrace. Are their concerns totally insignificant to Ms. Parker that they do not merit a sentence in her diversionary polemic? Didn't it cross her threshold that the youngters involved, and not involved,
may be having, among other feelings, anxious moments about coming forward with info or just burying the sleezy affair?
And wouldn't it have been obvious to consider their parents for a line?
I had a friend read Ms. Parker's words and he asked me to pass on this advice to her: Try very hard to keep your day job.
I had a friend read Ms. Parker's words and he asked me to pass on this advice to her: Try very hard to keep your day job.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home